A key superiority in comparison to direct real estate factually identified is that indirect real estate is less resource intensive, simpler persuasion as a strategy for investing in international markets, and minimal concentration risk within the real estate investment portfolio.

Indirect real estate completely voids the need for individual or institutional investors to systematically associate with provincial specialists and third-party service providers for sourcing, acquisition, leasing, management and disposal of tangible real estate assets in performing their investment strategies. Since these are ‘paper’ assets and primarily managed by establishments with distinct expertise in finance, greater degree of transparency is observed due to key underlying information and financial metrics being available for investors to perform diligence upon. Subsequently, these aspects further enhance the simplicity of investment and eliminate the arbitrary negotiation element that is evident in most phases of an investor’s journey in direct real estate.